tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post5966185177996761062..comments2023-10-14T08:20:40.438-07:00Comments on Ayesha's Saudade: On Male DominanceAyeshahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comBlogger24125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-45602112916546815412012-06-18T21:33:50.685-07:002012-06-18T21:33:50.685-07:00Oh yes there is: Become the slave to a woman. Of c...Oh yes there is: Become the slave to a woman. Of cors, not to just 'a' woman, not even a vanilla femdom, or one of those lame dominant housewives, cos they will never be able to enslave u, take u away from ur competitive world, and own u 24/7/365 till u die. <br /><br />But u say u can't? Or is it just that u don't want, that u r too much of a coward to leave the safety of ur comfort zone, and believe that blaming society for ur misfortune and using same as an excuse would leave u off the hook, and give u a valuable reason to not "let go"? Or is it simply that u r not slave material at all, and only can fantasize about living in slavery? Yes, that must be it, cos a slave would never come up with a comment like urs, and instead would follow his/her instincts no matter what. There would simply be no other way... ;)Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-90047849778683567802012-05-31T06:15:51.507-07:002012-05-31T06:15:51.507-07:00" It's typical male! Always looking for c..." It's typical male! Always looking for competition, always ready to fight, always in need to be defensive. Hmmm, is this really typical for the male of the species?"<br /><br />In our current society, that is what a man is. You learn to compete and fight right from childhood. Fight with your siblings, fight on the school playground, compete for success.. it never ends..<br /><br />You don't think I'd like to take it easy and just not compete? Of course I would. In a utopia perhaps free of competition, I'd just keep myself fit and healthy and hope to find a woman like yourself and give up every bit of freedom for the sexual slavery I need.. like you said... <br /><br />"Sexual slavery makes a male more powerful and free, than he even could be otherwise."<br /><br />You know how much I *want* to believe that and just let go.. ? You probably do from reading your other posts, about how great the need to give up freedom to a dominant woman is within a male slave.<br /><br />But I can't. And neither can most other men. Manhood, in the real world is earned through competition, conflict and eventual success. There are other things you need to survive apart from sex. And all those involve competition and willingness to fight other men. In fact, even to get an opportunity for sex, there is a lot of competition. So the readiness to compete and fight always has to be there for a man. There is simply no other way...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-81350679413284486652011-01-26T23:04:54.574-08:002011-01-26T23:04:54.574-08:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzUat_wC6Ko&fea...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzUat_wC6Ko&feature=relatedAyeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-55896890630048876062011-01-26T15:26:02.963-08:002011-01-26T15:26:02.963-08:00Kinda' like the Blondie - Morrison hermaphrodi...Kinda' like the Blondie - Morrison hermaphrodite. Spinning globes of mirrors replacing strobe lights. One looking at tomorrow, while the other swirls yesterday and today.PateInducedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17969037153674233214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-16282817055702959152009-10-26T09:46:14.670-07:002009-10-26T09:46:14.670-07:00And then there's that third specimen Gina.It&#...And then there's that third specimen Gina.It's the one i described for instance in "Femdom.....a chat". They're rare, but they do exist.Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-14886352529700352722009-10-26T03:11:22.002-07:002009-10-26T03:11:22.002-07:00I love the piece Ayesha! I have always thought tha...I love the piece Ayesha! I have always thought that were 2 kinds of men.....'real men' (passionate and loving and truly supportive of what We do...and to me that means worshiping us with full respect to the level of getting on the floor and groveling, but this is freedom and liberation as it is the destiny they were born for)...and then there is the 'other type'...those that are doomed like dinosaurs....those aren't 'maledoms'....they are just arrogant and disrespectful, and have yet to figure out destiny. I just laugh and take comfort that they will be extinct as time moves forward.Boot Goddess Ginahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09759870655562148494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-49578860052213345792009-07-24T15:40:42.541-07:002009-07-24T15:40:42.541-07:00Apart from the ones who intimately r living with m...Apart from the ones who intimately r living with me in That Place, and share in my daily activities, i never met anyone who was interested in the subject when linked to ffd, left alone write about it. Which is not a surprise of cors, as feminine femdom is not routine business on our planet, lol. Within the scientific world there r a few women tho, discussing the matter. Take for instance the 2 Jacqueline. I mean Rose and Barus-Michel. The first one is certainly not a favorite of mine, but for reasons not relevant to the subject at hand. The second one? Read, "Désir, passion, érotisme: l'expérience de la jouissance", and judge for urself. <br /><br />Anything that can only be experienced and not expressed, i find below board. But then again, i think anything can be expressed. People r often too lazy, and don't make an effort to express themselves, beyond the ways they were taught in that area.Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-14102277152118432312009-07-24T13:45:16.406-07:002009-07-24T13:45:16.406-07:00the jouissance of the feminine femdom... the white...the jouissance of the feminine femdom... the white hot center.. has any woman (other than you) ever written of it? or is this something that is just experienced and not expressed?tina bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03963966546078838538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-13845949257253940812009-07-23T19:38:35.723-07:002009-07-23T19:38:35.723-07:00It's the jouissance of the feminine femdom Tin...It's the jouissance of the feminine femdom Tina. But not exactly a la Lacan :)Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-40106569235466978322009-07-23T19:17:07.755-07:002009-07-23T19:17:07.755-07:00yes... i can feel that you would allow no barriers...yes... i can feel that you would allow no barrierstina bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03963966546078838538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-66747678010873253062009-07-22T20:11:09.504-07:002009-07-22T20:11:09.504-07:00B..b...ut Tina....Jacques was a male too eh.
Psss...B..b...ut Tina....Jacques was a male too eh.<br /><br />Pssst.......i do enjoy tho, to shatter the non existing barriers between the domina and the slave, and merging with him/her via the singularity. Blissful, lol.Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-39487725489434722132009-07-22T16:11:25.593-07:002009-07-22T16:11:25.593-07:00mr kouremenos.. i did have a long discussion with ...mr kouremenos.. i did have a long discussion with ayesha about deleuze's book and it's funny that i never saw it then but his view points are exclusively male.. his literary prototypes are men: de sade and masoch, and, of course, he is a man. from the male view point there is the sadean male, the philosophic didact oppressor and the masochian male, the trainer of his single ideal owner. missing is the jouissance of the dominant female, something he does not set out to address and cannot know.tina bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03963966546078838538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-2265868498620005392009-07-19T17:07:35.946-07:002009-07-19T17:07:35.946-07:00I created this blog cos Yahoo 360 was terminated. ...I created this blog cos Yahoo 360 was terminated. Most of my writings there, will be re-published here. So pay attention, and u'll find the answers to ur questions at the appropriate time.Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-1566602257465936692009-07-19T14:13:47.644-07:002009-07-19T14:13:47.644-07:00"maybe u were dead serious, and meant i could..."maybe u were dead serious, and meant i could be dominated against my will?"<br /><br />I was serious, but I didn't mean you could be dominated against your will; I rather asked whether you LIKED TO be dominated also, since you said that Deleuze's belief against unification between d and s is wrong and you are the living proof of that (but it seems I don't understand what you mean by unification --see below). I did read your opinion about switching, but doesn't your opinion coincide with Deleuze's belief? That was my question.<br /><br /><br />"the question what unification would mean"<br /><br />Yes; that's what I don't seem to understand. What do you mean by unification between d and s?<br /><br /><br />"i have a feeling u don't have a clue about feminine femdom"<br /><br />I'd like to hear it defined by you. Is it equivalent to female sadism? OK, you say you don't subscribe to labeling, but we're dealing with words here per force.Costas N. Kouremenoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11558773262829003157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-34869310729507515462009-07-18T14:57:57.042-07:002009-07-18T14:57:57.042-07:00Oh yes.......men, lol. Little do they know about t...Oh yes.......men, lol. Little do they know about the cravings dwelling in a female soul. Busy as they r with their own desires and fantasies, they have no time to venture there. But.....like i've observed occasionally, some made/make an effort nevertheless. Real dare devils those ones. True adventurers even. Alas, most back off when the female soul veil is lifted, and her poisonous love is exposed. But then again, the few who survive the song of the siren, will be blessed with a sight they longed for since the day they were expelled from the womb!Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-9848734052578182702009-07-18T13:16:17.288-07:002009-07-18T13:16:17.288-07:00yes, the hyperbola is not addressed in the literar...yes, the hyperbola is not addressed in the literary models that deleuze used. of course, his models were taken from the writings of men.tina bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03963966546078838538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-63796153280615644162009-07-17T20:05:42.410-07:002009-07-17T20:05:42.410-07:00My dear Costas N., how can u asked a question like...My dear Costas N., how can u asked a question like that, knowing my view on switching? Maybe u were just trying to tease me a bit? How lovely. But..... maybe u were dead serious, and meant i could be dominated against my will? U know, i would love a challenge like that, but up till now, nobody dared to go into that direction. Oh sure there were a few who suggested to role play such a scenario. Alas for them, i'm not a player. <br /><br />Of cors, even when ur question was meant like that, it would raise the question what unification would mean under such circumstances.<br /><br />Be all this as it may, i have a feeling u don't have a clue about feminine femdom, and r still stuck in vanilla d/s. It's only a feeling eh. But a strong one (grin).Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-50371115052660629112009-07-17T19:46:47.095-07:002009-07-17T19:46:47.095-07:00Yes Tina, it looks like that, lol. Very nauseating...Yes Tina, it looks like that, lol. Very nauseating too at times. Especially when vanilla experts r mingling with stuff they never experienced outside of their theoretical frames of reference. Hmmm....maybe the watched a porn movie now and then too perhaps?<br />But when it comes to hyperbola phenomena, like the singularity, this is THE thing to pursue. I'm sure u remember my exquisite diatribes on the subject in the late 360. And to think, the hyperbola is not even a circle....tsss....tskk.Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-21072256128082461862009-07-17T13:53:06.427-07:002009-07-17T13:53:06.427-07:00"His [Deleuze's] belief tho, that there c..."His [Deleuze's] belief tho, that there can't be a unification between d and s (...) The poor philosopher would have revised his writings on the subject instantly, if he could have seen me in action"<br /><br />Does this mean that you dominate but also are dominated?Costas N. Kouremenoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11558773262829003157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-15344270120710069532009-07-16T19:19:10.342-07:002009-07-16T19:19:10.342-07:00it's the eternal return of the same!it's the eternal return of the same!tina bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03963966546078838538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-66774487124533079822009-07-15T21:31:29.188-07:002009-07-15T21:31:29.188-07:00Fantasies? Oh I’m sure there must be males fantasi...Fantasies? Oh I’m sure there must be males fantasizing about being a maledom. But i was talking about r//l d/s. No maledoms there.<br /><br />In contrast to many others, i'm not one who subscribes to the importance of labeling/classifying, and the endless search for definitions etc, when it comes to d/s. <br /><br />Deleuze is a nice read. His belief tho, that there can't be a unification between d and s (or s and m, if that would suit u better), may be true when it comes to mainstream d/s, but is certainly not my experience within the realm of ffd. The poor philosopher would have revised his writings on the subject instantly, if he could have seen me in action, feeling blessed he finally found the unbiased empirical data he was so fond of.Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-74171269145214029462009-07-15T14:10:45.111-07:002009-07-15T14:10:45.111-07:00Maybe I didn't get the point of your posting. ...Maybe I didn't get the point of your posting. Wasn't it that there are no males with true dominating fantasies? Anyway, forget it.<br /><br />An interesting read (fascinating for me, see below) is Gilles Deleuze's "Pre'sentation de Sacher-Masoch", where he successfully disproves the traditional freudian claim that a (male) masochist is an inverted sadist, by referring to the texts themselves (Sade's texts and Masoch's texts) and to their quite different ...perfume. I read it when I was 16 and it gave me a sense of identity that previous (psychoanalytical) books about the subject had not given me the least.Costas N. Kouremenoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11558773262829003157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-78325218269377278072009-07-14T22:28:36.459-07:002009-07-14T22:28:36.459-07:00Let me put is this way: I never finished any of hi...Let me put is this way: I never finished any of his books, although i've tried. Most of the time his writings easily get me bored, while his depictions of sexual cruelty and violence either make me laugh or disgust me. <br /><br />Unlike others i'm not really interested in his motives or intentions, as i will never be able to verify same. He could have been the ultimate freedom fighter some believe he was, also a satirical snob trying to provoke the establishment of his time, or simply a guy who needed a justification for his own sexual impulses. <br /><br />From what was handed to me about his personal sexual behavior, i must say, that he was lucky enough i was born centuries later!<br /><br />So far my take on him in general. But.....why did u ask? Is there, in ur view, a the relation between his books and maledom perhaps? Enlighten me, as i don't see it.Ayeshahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13021584294809647967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7854932864648424898.post-264815032911716672009-07-14T01:33:49.327-07:002009-07-14T01:33:49.327-07:00If so, what do you make of Marquis de Sade's b...If so, what do you make of Marquis de Sade's books?Costas N. Kouremenoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11558773262829003157noreply@blogger.com