Wednesday, November 30, 2011

The angry young man


The following is all Raposo’s fault. It was he who informed me about some gossip going on about me in Sara’s site. Naturally i couldn’t resist having a peek. He knew that of cors, that sly wolffox. After having had my fill of the somewhat semi sophisticated and overly academically babble regarding the alleged benefits of moderation or something, and intrigued by the remark of Sara’s companion that my blog was not his cup of tea, i hastily wandered to the blog of that person to see what kind of tea was in his cup.

Contrary to his accusation that i never had read anything else from his site, which btw he’s sharing with his bride, than the first entry (u can read the juicy details of that later), i absorbed a rather big chunk of his rather “more of the same” blog, and came to the conclusion, that, although they were in the very beginning of some sort of vanilla FLR with little perspective, they were a nice, innocent, and highly agreeable couple, very much in love with each other, and eager to explore the more kinky (what a horrible word eh?) side of their marriage. Well, so it seemed to me.

Oh, b4 i go on with this soap, which again is totally Raposo’s doing, u should know, that como custumber, i won’t reveal their names nor the url of their blog. And if some of u smartasses still would find out, don’t come to me, but go to Raposo, cos that too will be his fault.

And i left everything as it was published on that site. All stayed in its original form. No editing, including their(lol) numerous typos, whatsoever.

Ok. Let’s move on, and continue to make this short story long. As u probably know already, i’m one who believes there’s no way femdom could exist without humor. Especially my humor can’t be missed. Yeah u r right, at times it can be a bit spicy ( for the more squeamish among us a bit too spicy even), but always coming to u with the best of intentions, never mean or meant to hurt. Y’all know that eh? I knew it! U all understand me so well all the time. U r great! Really! And i mean it too. U can trust me on that.

So i commented:


This is all so deliciously casual. So "oh let's have some fun in our life". Which of cors is a good thing. Just go on with ur kinky adventures in vanilla femdom land.

But Cleopatra was far from femdom u know? Maybe therefore u used CleoToptra instead? Rofl.

Go and read some more of this illustrious duo, b4 u convince urself u had left ur vanilla life.

It goes without saying, i surely am not ur cup of tea. And i looked into my crystal ball, and u know what? There will be no tea party ever.

Oh, and the next time u like to exchange some thoughts about my political views, ideas on femdom, and anything else to gossip about, give my regards to Sara The Ultimate Submissive Alpha Male (grin).

Granted, it was a bit spicy indeed, but completely snowed over by genuine humor of the purest kind. Oh, and b4 i forget,. For those of u who refused to pay attention in school, the other part of that duo was Marcus Antonius.

And what did i get in return (sigh)?


Whatever...honestly i don't give a shit what you think.

CleoTOPtra was chosen merely because CleoPATra was already taken on a board that we frequent and we wanted the usernames to be the same on both sites...not that it is any of your fucking business. Any time you want to compare your knowledge of REAL history with me, bring it on. I have studied with some of the most respected and reknowned scholars in the world. Good luck with that. i am well aware of just how Femdom she probably was or was not. My best guess (and that is all that historians can do because the real woman did not have a blog), is that she was semi-Femdom and in other ways not - such was the way of the world then.

Since you chose to write on our very first post instead of reading more about where we are now it is obvious all you want to do is be a troll. Go troll somewhere else.

BTW, if you read what i ACTUALLY said on Saratoga's blog is that while i do not agree with you politically (and you just proved his point about your narrow-mindedness), i AM willing to look past it and glean other useful and interesting tidbits. Well...so much for that. I guess the only thing you want is for EVERYONE to conform to YOUR definition of what Femdom is and that YOUR way is the ONLY way. Bullshit. We are individuals each with their own thing they bring to the table. Tea party? Never entered my mind. It must have really chapped your ass that i dared to say that i did not agree with your politics.

And lastly, in case you did not know it, the name of our blog is "From Vanilla to Kinky" - thereby implying that it is both vanilla AND/OR kinky at any given time. We are fine with that. Go ahead and enjoy the way you live your life but it is pathetic you would choose to come here to demean they way we choose to live ours.

Kiss my ass.

Love and kisses,
(name withheld as promised)


Now that was a bit nasty, to say the least no? But, in case u haven’t noticed, with a touch of ambivalence. Maybe a twisted one, but it was undeniably there. This guy would have followed me unconditionally to the Labyrinth with a snap of my finger. Of cors i never could have done such a terrible thing to his delicate bride.

Then he wrote to his readers:

To the readers,

Sorry for stooping the the level of the last commenter. Apparently she is in a feud of sorts with a few bloggers whom I respect and I "hurt her feelings" when I commented on one of those blogs that, while I did not agree with her politics (decidedly radical), I did glean some insight via her observations on the topic of FemDoom. She must have very thin skin considering she is supposedly a rough tough Domme. The funny thing is that she has a history of similar run-ins with several of the bloggers I respect so I guess I should be flattered.

If you take the time to read through the rest of the blog I hope you will see the kinder, gentler, side of me. Don't let a troll spoil it for you.

(Name withheld as promised)

Hmmmmm, not very gentleman like either, no? I understood his struggle tho.


Still in a good mood tho, i replied:

".....i don't give a shit what you think."? Really? Then why come up with a lengthy, even edited, reply, larded with defense and explanations?

"Since you chose to write on our very first post instead of reading more about where we are now....."? U sure i didn’t? Based on scientific research maybe? Nah, u were simply assuming. That’s what u did. Or was it ur best guess perhaps, which is, like u said, all that historians can do?

Hmmm........."Shit. Kiss my ass (twice). Bullshit. Chapped ur ass. Fucking business. Troll. Narrow-mindedness." Is that really the way scholars converse and express themselves these days? Tssss, tsskkkk.

And psssst, i let the ancient Marcus Antonius read ur first as well as ur second (edited) comment. U know what he whispered to me then? "Ayesha, although i still am mourning her death, i’m so glad Κλεοπάτρα has been spared from reading foul language like that"

I’m sure u agree there was no spice in this at all. Maybe i was a little bit lecturing this good willing and resisting young man, but not more than that. And all with the good intention to lead him away from his ill chosen path.

So what came next? (Parental guidance strongly advised)

You are so full of shit.

Nothing has been "edited" - how can someone "edit" their own reply??? I merely corrected a few typos and added a few new things the occured to me...all of which took a few minutes - tops. Big fucking deal.

Yes - I am quite sure you never read much of the rest of the blog and you have yet to provide one shred of evidence to the contrary. Want to prove me wrong? Then comment in a thoughtful, substantial, and need I daresay a respectful way, on the topics that other posts address and I will listen to your sage wisdom. Otherwise, you are just a troll.

And, no, I never said that "all" historians do is guess. What I said, or at least heavily implied, is that sometimes historians have to guess as to certain aspects of history. DUH!!! Why else do you think that historians often disagree with each other? Nobody really knows the inner dynamics of ANY ancient person. It is difficult enough to know the details of the events themselves. Stop pretending to be an expert on Marcus Antonius or Cleopatra for that matter. You are not. Neither am I. Much of that time and how they REALLY were as PERSONS is clouded in mystery.

So Marcus whispered to you? REALLY? You are either a liar or a nut - or both. Take your pick. Foul language by me? Your snarky comments started it. I never said anything against you except except I don't agree with your politics. Big fucking deal. If you are such a bad ass Domme then why do you have such a thin skin? The subs you torture are far stronger than that. Wimp.

And guess what? Κλεοπάτρα heard plenty of foul language in her day and Marcus never fucking whispered to you. Wow, I am VERY impressed (not) you threw a bit of Greek in there. Google is great, isn't it?

Go crawl into your hole and leave us alone. We didn't hurt you or demean you or your lifestyle. Throw your rocks in a different direction.

Future comments from you will not be published unless you want to comment on a topic in a manner that is respectful (read: criticism is fine and sometimes even appreciated as that is how we learn).

Lastly, I only said "kiss my ass" once. Not twice. Go back and see for yourself. Such is the wonderous powers of your observation.

But now that you mention it, I will say it again. Kiss my ass. There - NOW I have said it twice.

Fuck you,

(Name withheld as promised)

P.S. Is it REALLY that difficult to write full words instead of being lazy and resorting to text-speak? U? UR? Really? Get a fucking clue and write in proper language. There is a time and a place to write in text-speak. U know when that is? When UR fucking texting!

Noticing his staggering anger and dangerously losing control, i tried soothing the situation by writing the following calming words:

Blaming me now for ur foul language? Okay, ok. U r not the first male not to be man enough to stand tall for his own actions. So i’ll carry ur load. I'm not so sure if ur mom will accept this for an excuse tho. And neither will Marcus. Not that he told me this himself eh? It was Lilith who informed me about this, while we had our daily cup of black tea.

Now, was this not a fine criticism or what? Of cors it was. I'm sure u loved it too, and were overwhelmed by it from appreciation. And if not? Well then u must be a trolley.

Now repeat after me: "We moderate our comments but never edit them and always publish them unless the commenter wants to say something to us privately and asks that their comment not be published...." Remember that one? Very good. I just knew u would, and, like the true foul language using gentleman that u r, would have no other choice than to keep ur word honorably.

La verità è il tutto :)


And waddaya know? It worked! Well….um….only for a fleeting moment. But still it was something, no? Here goes:


Oh I take it back - I will publish your idiotic comment just because it is too delicious.

You bet I am blaming you for my "foul language" - you have been the source of my provocation. And until you write a thoughtful, respectful, and meaningful comment on other posts we have written, you will remain the troll that you are. Go ahead and prove it to me. Prove that your insights are worth more than the dirt on a little child's hands. Give me something to work with.

Oh so now it waas "Lilith" who talks to you. How convenient. Are you sure it wasn't "Bozo the Clown"? He is just as real and certainly more relevent. At least Bozo had good TV ratings and gave joy to others instead of merely catering to the deluded fantasies of radical femanists. Lilith? Really? You really are a nutjob.

My mother would be perfectly fine with anything I have written to you (actually her words would be far more scathing) so don't even go there. Careful, Ayesha, your ignorance is - once again - showing.

I see you are still writing in text-speak. I'm impressed. You get to be lazy AND pretend to be an intellectual at the same time. Get it through your fucking pea brain - we are not texting. It makes U seem like a moron. R U getting it? I bet not.

The truth is the whole? You wouldn't know it if it hit you in the ass. I am actually an Italian citizen so stop trying to impress me with quoting Italian, Greek, Latin, or whatever language you choose. Go back to UR comfort zone and use American text-speak.

Let me add one caveat to my quoted statement about always publishing comments. That does not apply to trolls.

So crawl back into your dark place and pretend to converse with "Lilith" while you "both" (you and your imagination) glory in your superiority over those of us who have newly embraced a lifstyle that does not conform to your twisted and narrow vision of FemDom.

You know the beauty of the dirt on litle child's hand? It is so easily washed and forgotten.

So now that I have explained to you the caveat about trolls and publishing comments, please do us both a favor and write something meaningful (without rancor - play nice) on one of our posts or leave us alone. We haven't peed in your sandbox so kindly stop shitting in ours.

(This time there was no name to withhold)


In came Anonymous, in need to lay an egg as well, saying:

To Ayesha,
I don't mean to interject however, I enjoy reading this blog. However if you had any iota to speak in a clear and functional manner then a part of me wouldn't cringe at the way you write. Now, dare I ask, why are you badgering, harassing and/or just annoying people on THEIR (note that word THEIR) blogs. Personally, I feel annoyed that you would do such a thing. And another note, the foul language (even though at times I do use it myself) has its place. I am still vexed of how you write but that is neither here nor there. None of us (reading the comments and posts) know if you are educated thoroughly or not, or if you spend too much time on your Android, IPhone or other smart phone madly texting away. Just from reading, what I do know is that you are an annoying child who does idiotic things for attention. Bash me if you want, I truely don't care.
By the way on your first initial comment.... have you ever REALLY done anything kinky in your life or wanted to explore the kinkier side of yourself with your partner? Honestly, how dare you judge someone else! Here's a little note, try being with an absolute SADISTIC Femdom who doesn't give two pences about what you have to think or say, THEN write in your little monologue.
Another thing, if you are hearing voices of ancient people, you may need to go to a doctor for that, also using Google translate doesn't make your more educated, but it does help in times. And if I'm not mistaken, Κλεοπάτρα is Greek, not Egyptian. I'm just saying. Know your languages before you post them dear. In closing, bring people's mother's into a conversation isn't really that.... how do I say.... kind. If someone said something about your Mother, would you like it? (I am assuming that you have a good relationship with your Mother.) So I ask of you, Ayesha, please if you don't have anything worth commenting without using said foul language, please don't post anything at all and let the readers just read the posts and/or comment. Reading your tripe of phone lingo is taxing on my mind. Thank you

(Name withheld as promised)

Wow! If that was not a clear and confused lecture with some nasty leading questions, then what is? My lecture to (name withheld as promised) looks terribly pale to this one, no?

So after i had let sink it in, and caught my breath again, i shyly replied………and here comes in the role of Raposo, cos this comment, and all that came after it, never made it, never were published, never were made available to the readers of that site. And Raposo is one of those readers u know, insisting to read my prose. So what could i do? He’s a dear friend too. And on top of that, we both can’t stand moderation, remember? Besides, how could i not do his bidding? But whatever it is, Raposo is to blame for the very existence of me publishing here what was denied elsewhere. It’s all on him! I’m innocent. Free of any guilt. Consider this a disclaimer of mega proportions.

Read further at ur own risk!

@ (Name withheld as promised) Anonymous

Bash u? Mo chreach! Now why would i want to do such a nasty thing like that? On the contrary: Большое спасибо за информацию. But then again, no hay que ahogarse en un vaso de agua eh?

Yes, reality can be quite a handful, if not a total bitch! Did u know there r people who think they know what is real or not? Unbelievable! U want to have a taste? Go to http://ayeshafonseca.blogspot.com/2009/10/time-my-teachers-were-trying-to-explain.html and especially watch the video there. Of cors u also could read my prose. Well.....um......i mean if u would be willing to cope with my terrible spelling and grammar, lol.

".....to go to a doctor for that...."? Sure, sure, praise the shrink, and pass the neuroleptics. On the other hand, did u know that Lilith left that pitiful vanilla duo long b4 they couldn’t resist to take a chunk from the forbidden fruit, and thus avoided to share their lame fate of becoming mortal? She’s still among us u know, doing her thing like she did eons ago. As a matter of fact she is the first femdom. Of cors, not many would recognize her as such, as the Patriarch did his usual utmost to make people believe she’s a demon, mercilessly devouring babies and doing other awfully demonic stuff. He succeeded doing this pretty well too, as u well know, that fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt, no?

My mother is dead. And besides, (name withheld as promised) didn’t care at all as, like he said, his "mother would be perfectly fine with anything......"

Languages? Ah yes, good to have Google. I’m sure u can find all the little non-english things i brought up in between.

Ayesha vachangoti nyesu :)

And to (name withheld as promised) i wrote:

Oh (name withheld as promised)! Who r u? What r u trying to do to me? How could u? U know i'm innocent! U know i'm a saint!!

But i understand. And as the true Italian citizen that u r, i’m sure u know what impedit ira animum, ne possit cernere verum means. But it happens u know. It truly does. As u very well know.

Anyway, like (name withheld as promised) Anonymous, u r invited to cruise my blog a little. Beware tho to remember the great words of Cato: Legere enim et non intellegere neglegere est.

Arrivederci bambino mio ;)

Then, completely unexpected and out of the blue, bride (name withheld as promised) entered the arena:


Greetings Ayesha,
How dare you come to my blog and insult my sub and indirectly and directly insult me. I've never read your blog, nor have I ever heard of you until I woke up and read the horrible conversation within the comments of this post.

I'm sure you are a respectful and kind person in your own way and maybe this is just a bad day. I don't know you, you don't know me.

Please do not post on our blog again unless it is done out of wanting to help slubby and me and others with your good insightfulness and it is done with respect.

I wish you goodness and no harm.

Sincerely,

(Name withheld as promised)


Now that wasn’t too bad eh? Even a bit ladylike. Elegantly phrased and without using any foul language, name calling. or insinuations. A bit angry yes, but that’s understandable, as it was her lover that went over the edge. It’s only natural she would try to defend him, no? Truth to be told, she could even become my friend. So, out of courtesy, and filled to my corpus amygdaloideum with good will, i wrote as my final contribution:

Insulting is relative (name withheld as promised). What's an insult in the eyes of one person could come across like good humor to another, so on.

I'm one of those who hardly can be insulted or offended. Especially in Cyberspace this would be virtually impossible. But since u brought it up, take a look at the language ur sub was/is using in this thread. Could some of his attitude and phrasing qualify perhaps for being called insulting in ur eyes?

Help? Well, i'm not always in the mood to help people. Neither to do them harm. And besides, i hate traditional teaching. But my presence on the Net is partly motivated by helping people to find their way in FemdomLand indeed. The thing is tho, most can't handle the truth about the core of their own personality, rather deny same, and continue to fool themselves, often supported by other desperate seekers, claiming to be the femdom or slave they never will be. Of cors, when i'm pointing that out to them, granted, at times larded with a bit of sarcasm and malicious pleasure, they r really getting pissed off. Even more so when they discover i was right, but can't bring themselves to admit same. Then name calling and use of foul language will follow soon as well. It never varies, lol.

But there's also another reason for my kind of attitude and behavior in cases like this. I simply can't stand people who certainly could have a wonderful FLR or WLH relationship, but keep insisting it's a femdom one, claiming they have the right to call their relationship, even if it only touches a few elements of a 24/7/365 femdom life, whatever they want it to call. And yes, that's what i could call an insult for those people who r genuinely into femdom, were born for such a life, and never go from sub-and domspace, as vanilla people use to call it, to some other space. For my people femdom is not an experiment, a try out, or a kinky outlet to spice up vanilla sex.

Dare? U r right. U don't know me. If u did, u never would have dared to ask me that question. Go visit my blog, and find out about me. That’s if u would be interested at all of cors.

Namaste & L'Chaim, (name withheld as promised)!

Now, wasn’t that ladylike as well or what? A great exchange between two totally different but respectful women. That’s what these last two comments were. Examples of how people should interact and communicate!


In the meantime Raposo had sent something to them as well, and, although the bride and groom never published his contribution either, this blog wouldn’t be complete without it. So, without any further delay, here it is, and archived forever.

(Name withheld as promised), where are the insults you see? I wonder in what way you were indirectly and directly insulted by Ayesha.

It was quite a show by your husband. He fell apart as soon as a real person entered and disturbed his happy sandbox.

"If you take the time to read through the rest of the blog I hope you will see the kinder, gentler, side of me."

Not interested in seeing that. Ayesha's presence on the internet brings out much more interesting aspects of people's personalities.


Pfffffft……….. finally! It’s 03.45 am now. See how dedicated i am, and always there to serve u with the best and latest breaking news? I should get the Pulitzer Prize for that, dammit.

One last note. If anything, this blog clearly demonstrates how foolish moderation actually is. Especially when Raposo is around, as he will take care that all will come out in the open, no matter what, one way or the other. But, as y’all have noticed, only in a humorous, constructive, harmless, neat, compassionate, polite, and utterly lenient way.

One very last note. Although this was an eloquent example of QED, it wouldn’t hurt our community if the ones who have moderation in place, to moderate themselves once in a while.

PS. I just got note (guess from whom, hehehe), that (name withheld as promised) or his bride (name withheld as promised), removed from their site all and everything related to all of this. Yeah, he/she/they must have felt the sword of Damocles was upon him/her/them. Hmmmmm, maybe he/she/they picked up my suggestion even b4 it hit the air? Smart move!

31 comments:

  1. Ayesha-

    Well, technically I guess it did begin on my blog post. But what was written there, from what I could see, didn't even constitute an appetizer compared to the main course I skimmed on the blog of the young couple about whom this post is.

    I didn't honestly dwell on the exchange there, left no comment. Too much negative energy pour moi.

    That written, U be U, Woman! I agree with U, candor is a prerequisite in FemDom. One has choices of how to deal with it, but, there it is.

    -s

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, it began with a cosy little chat about Ayesha in the comments to one of your blogs. A blog about a scene in a 1930's movie, and we know how awfully strict you can be about comments having to be relevant to the topic of the blogs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is funny how the woman thought that Ayesha might be having a bad day, while she completely overlooked her husband's wonderful prose. That's a loyal wife! After I had sent my comment to her, I realized that she might not get a chance to see it, since the husband can hide people's replies and comments not only from public view, but also from domestic insight.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It made me laugh out loud a couple of times, especially when I saw the white paw. The last time a symbol found its way into the images of this blog, it was the Krav Maga logo, hehe!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ayesha my question is for you and for anyone who has a view.

    What do you think of bad folk? That is to say both mean boys and mean girls.

    Satan

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Sara. One of my main motives to compose this blog, was to actually prove that people can pose as if they're really nice, educated, constructive, and genuine interested in other people’s ideas, affairs, and feelings, but once the fake upper layers of their personality r removed by even a simple tease like mine, they show what's hidden underneath that laughable cover.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @ Raposo. It's even possible there weren't 2 people carrying that blog in the first place (grin)

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ Polly. Was Paula giggling as well?

    ReplyDelete
  9. @ Raposo. Just picture what would happen if the one with military Krav Maga skills, accompanied by an animal like that, would be meeting a horde of kkk members in the woods.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @ Satan. Define "bad" and "mean".

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oct 2009 Ayesha said... “The time Semmelweis proposed, that death caused by childbed fever could be cut considerably by washing hands in antiseptic fluids...” (Satan calls that good) “...he was declared insane, and imprisoned in a mental hospital, even tho he had shown to his colleagues, and the world, that his methods worked!” (Satan calls that bad and mean)
    Satan

    ReplyDelete
  12. Those r not definitions, but examples, Satan. In this case ur bad people were simply the morons of their times, unable to imagine the existence of organisms invisible to the human eye. Something analog to the morons of our times, who exclude the possibility of immortality. Calling people like that "bad folk", is a bit farfetched in my book. But they were wrong for sure.

    In a way, Semmelweis was a moron too, cos he miscalculated the moronic reaction to his findings by his fellow medical morons, who btw also were driven by envy, jealousy, and fear to lose reputation.

    Does this make me a bad and mean woman now?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes Semmelweis did a good job at least. His rivals did not. So good and bad are labels. I told you that I did not see you as bad. I did not know though. Of course some men do want some real bad girl to own them. But what do you think of that then Snow Queen?

    Satan

    ReplyDelete
  14. Satan, i think the best thing i can do now, is to withdraw the benefit of the doubt i gave u for a while, and not take u seriously anymore.

    U better go now, and play with the rest of the FLR kids on their blog(ck)s.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I can go for you Ayesha. But I am still deadly serious. Semmelweis might just have done what they told him. But then he could not have saved those lives. Then his fellow Doctors would not have had him dismissed or locked up as insane. Nor tortured and killed.

    Satan

    ReplyDelete
  16. Might have been. I'll ask Lina. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ayesha,

    Let me start off by offering an olive branch and an apology for my part of our ugly exchange. I believe in making amends whenever possible and I am not afraid to admit it when I have not behaved in a way that reflects my better qualities.

    Actually, I am a nice person with a very long fuse (although I can't blame you for doubting that) unless I feel that I am being provoked. And, at the time, I felt provoked. Think of it from my side of things for a moment. The very first thing you wrote to me (us) was laced with sarcasm. Anytime a person begins a conversation with sarcasm - especially with someone who is a stranger - you are already behind the curve and the chance of a fruitful discussion is almost nill. While that does not excuse my own behavior, surely you must understand how sarcasm actually hinders a decent exchange.

    If you do not agree with our approach to this lifestyle that is very new to us, simply say so (without sarcasm) and tell us why and offer some positive suggestions. Had you actually read the blog (and sorry, I still don't think you have except for a brief skimming), you will find MANY highly critical and even harsh comments from other Dommes about our approach, but our responses back to them were gracious and appreciative. So it simply isn't true that I can only be nice if someone agrees with our preconceived ideas.

    No offense, but I would never follow you into your Labyrinth with a snap of your fingers. A loaded gun? Maybe. I have no shortage of opportunities to explore this life with people I actually know personally.

    While I appreciate the flattery, I am not a "young man" (more evidence you have not really read the blog since I often mention my age in there). I am in my late 50s. Not trying to quibble, but just thought you'd want to be accurate.

    Sorry but I just don't see where any of your words were "shoothing" or "calming" nor could I tell you were in a good mood while trying to be helpful. Now that I am re-reading the exchange I still don't see it. But that is the danger of the written word. I can't see your body language or the tone of your voice. But I am more than willing to take your word for it. Because we started off on the wrong foot I was more prone to read the worst into your words. My bad.

    Cleo is a real person - her posts have a vast different style of prose than mine.

    I did not delete Reposo's comment. Cleo deleted it within moments of it being sent. The first time I saw it was a few minutes ago on your blog. She was just sick and tired of the whole thing. We mutually decided to remove it from our blog because it was, frankly, embarrassing and far too negative - especially to fall on the very first post of our blog. I know you don't like moderated comments, but we have our reasons which are personal to us. The only time we have deleted and/or not posted comments was this one time.

    Anyway, once again my apologies and I really do invite you to comment again (for the first time - LOL) on our blog. If you choose not to, or don't enjoy our blog - that's okay. I can live with it. If you want to comment - please do.

    Marc

    ReplyDelete
  18. Reposo,

    Actually, it is untrue that all I want is a happy sandbox. I like being challenged (respectfully) and if you actually read the blog you will see many examples of this.

    But now I have to ask myself what it is you want.

    On the one hand, you are critical of my "falling apart" when I felt my sandbox was being disturbed, but then you also declined to see the "kinder, gentler" side of me. So which is it? Just curious.

    But let's you and I start off on the right foot. You, too, are welcome to comment on the blog just as Eyesha is.

    Marc

    ReplyDelete
  19. A bit of clarification here. When I wrote that Cleo and I "mutually decided to delete it" I was referring to the whole conversation and not just Reposo's comment.

    And it should read "soothing" not "shoothing"...sheesh...I should proof-read better. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "....our ugly exchange...." Our? "

    "....was laced with sarcasm” Sarcasm? Try light humor.

    "....sarcasm actually hinders a decent exchange." Apparently in ur world it does. In mine? It’s welcomed like the fine touch of an expertly oiled whip.

    "....highly critical and even harsh comments from other Dommes...." Yeah right.

    "....No offense, but I would never follow you...." Caramba, u must be truly a special specimen of the male gender.

    "....I am in my late 50s." And that should be enough for me to change the title of my blog? Try to figure out the "hidden" meaning of it, old man.

    "....but just thought you'd want to be accurate." Wrong thought.

    "Now that I am re-reading the exchange I still don't see it." No surprise there.

    "But I am more than willing to take your word for it." Don’t ever do such thing with femdoms, as u'll be sorry.

    "....we started off on the wrong foot.... We?

    "....I should proof-read better." Yes, u r very right there. But still, u did some proof-reading nonetheless, and when done with that, u still spelled my name Eyesha?

    ---------------------

    Btw, "We mutually decided to remove it from our blog because it was, frankly, embarrassing and far too negative...." But still u wanted to come and visit my place eh?
    B4 answering that (if u ever will), think, re-think, and proof-read ur answer thoroughly.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Marc, you had a question for me: "On the one hand, you are critical of my "falling apart" when I felt my sandbox was being disturbed, but then you also declined to see the "kinder, gentler" side of me. So which is it? Just curious."

    Look at Ayesha's reply to Saratoga here, it expresses well what I had in mind when I made my comment. I have seen these things happen a lot of times when Ayesha comes along and rocks people's boats. I didn't decline to see that other side of you, I had already seen it before I made my comment.

    Your wife deleted my comment so you had to come here to see it. But it's not here and now that you and I are starting out, trying to find the right foot. Our relationship started when I saw how you replied to Ayesha's comments, and how you later were blocking her from replying to three people who commented against her! But I can tell you that we are not enemies. Not even if among your insults you told Ayesha to "crawl into her hole", which ranks among the worst things I've ever had to read about her. And look, you're the one who insists on respectful behaviour, while I, like Ayesha, am not excessively attached to the traditional rituals of that concept.

    I'm not a regular blog commenter, so you won't be seeing much of me. I have no interest in blogs about kinky games, or "play", as supposedly erotic activities are often called. I have no interest in "dommes", or in regular reports about the bedroom activities of married couples.

    But when Ayesha visits somebody's blog, her extremely interesting points about no-nonsense femdom can often be found in the comments section. Or simply her straight view on the twisted and stupid human society that people cherish as their master and supreme guide. I keep an eye on some blogs for this reason, it gives me a chance to read things that can't be found anywhere else. That a unique contributor like Ayesha can be classified as a troll(!) by the people in the so-called "femdom" blogosphere, shows what an incredibly shallow kindergarten it is, intellectually and emotionally.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Raposo Neves, oh Wolf among the Foxes which make the snow look ever whiter than Snow White herself, this time it's i who's left speechless. There's simply nothing my paralyzed vocal chords could produce to shadow ur words. So the only thing left for me to do is to take ur breath away by hugging u till u collapse by asphyxia.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Haha! That's a passionate hug!

    After I had caused this ruckus in Marc's life, the least I could do was to give him a comprehensive reply. And maybe an extra hint. He left so hastily again when you didn't fall... hm... unconditionally, for his apologies.

    ReplyDelete
  24. The hug made me think of the wolves: "Everything a wolf does is with intensity and exaggeration"... Here's a good one: "Just picture what would happen if the one with military Krav Maga skills, accompanied by an animal like that, would be meeting a horde of kkk members in the woods."

    It's a beautiful couple for sure! And even without the prospect of a little skirmishing, I'm sure wolfie would thrive whenever he'd get a chance to be with her in the woods. Indoors, he might get on her nerves by chewing up her leather furniture. Or sneaking away with her riding boots, haha!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Although at times she might allow this liberated and freedom loving animal to feast himself on her stuff, rest assured she could leash him as well. Of cors, not with some chewable leather one, but with a very short one made of surgical steel. Chew on that :-p

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ayesha, you did not hug Satan for his questions of “good” and “bad”.

    Satan

    ReplyDelete
  27. Raposo Neves said... “...the twisted and stupid human society...”

    It will be interesting if you roll out some better human society. Then we can compare the twisted and stupid one.

    Just like good and bad.

    Satan

    ReplyDelete
  28. No need to roll it out and compare, Satan, I trust you when you say it is better.

    ReplyDelete